<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:series="http://unfoldingneurons.com/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Re-engaging the Neighborhood</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.evangelismcoach.org/2008/re-engaging-the-neighborhood/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.evangelismcoach.org/2008/re-engaging-the-neighborhood/</link>
	<description>Fearless Evangelism Training and Church Growth in the Americas</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 10 Mar 2010 23:15:04 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Scott</title>
		<link>http://www.evangelismcoach.org/2008/re-engaging-the-neighborhood/comment-page-1/#comment-1545</link>
		<dc:creator>Scott</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Sep 2009 15:26:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.evangelismcoach.org/2008/09/re-engaging-the-neighborhood#comment-1545</guid>
		<description>Great post!

So the church used an &quot;attractional&quot; to get to &quot;missional!&quot;  Common sense tells me making it attractional VERSUS missional, or making them mutually exclusive is wrong. It&#039;s not an either/or, it&#039;s both/and...

I&#039;m not at all surprised to see that churches that really are engaging their communities and reaching people for Christ are doing some of both.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great post!</p>
<p>So the church used an &#8220;attractional&#8221; to get to &#8220;missional!&#8221;  Common sense tells me making it attractional VERSUS missional, or making them mutually exclusive is wrong. It&#8217;s not an either/or, it&#8217;s both/and&#8230;</p>
<p>I&#8217;m not at all surprised to see that churches that really are engaging their communities and reaching people for Christ are doing some of both.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: EvangelismCoach</title>
		<link>http://www.evangelismcoach.org/2008/re-engaging-the-neighborhood/comment-page-1/#comment-1503</link>
		<dc:creator>EvangelismCoach</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Aug 2009 01:25:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.evangelismcoach.org/2008/09/re-engaging-the-neighborhood#comment-1503</guid>
		<description>@Don

Thanks for sharing what your church does.  Building relational bridges are still important for attractional models as well as churches working the missional culture.  I think healthy churches need both.

@Derek
Thanks for pointing out the both/and.  I&#039;ve been reading The Tangible kingdom and it contains many of these same themes.  Currently planting a church from scratch and working the missional angle as we are still small.

@elliot
I&#039;ve seen congregations that won&#039;t re-engage.  I&#039;ve seen Pastors try to lead, but they don&#039;t want to follow -- one party eventually leaves.  I&#039;ve seen pastors work to help bring the grumblers along, but Crandalls work shows that after the pastor leaves, the church stumbles again.

Thanks all for sharing your thoughts.  Keep it up . .</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Don</p>
<p>Thanks for sharing what your church does.  Building relational bridges are still important for attractional models as well as churches working the missional culture.  I think healthy churches need both.</p>
<p>@Derek<br />
Thanks for pointing out the both/and.  I&#8217;ve been reading The Tangible kingdom and it contains many of these same themes.  Currently planting a church from scratch and working the missional angle as we are still small.</p>
<p>@elliot<br />
I&#8217;ve seen congregations that won&#8217;t re-engage.  I&#8217;ve seen Pastors try to lead, but they don&#8217;t want to follow &#8212; one party eventually leaves.  I&#8217;ve seen pastors work to help bring the grumblers along, but Crandalls work shows that after the pastor leaves, the church stumbles again.</p>
<p>Thanks all for sharing your thoughts.  Keep it up . .</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Elliot</title>
		<link>http://www.evangelismcoach.org/2008/re-engaging-the-neighborhood/comment-page-1/#comment-1497</link>
		<dc:creator>Elliot</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Jul 2009 03:15:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.evangelismcoach.org/2008/09/re-engaging-the-neighborhood#comment-1497</guid>
		<description>Makes perfect sense (now here is the &quot;but&quot;) What if the congregation isn&#039;t willing to re-engage? I see many churches close their doors in my denomination each year because they won&#039;t, can&#039;t, or say they don&#039;t have the &quot;right&quot; pastor (leadership) to do so.  Sounds like leadership from within the church (laity) needs to embrace the Holy Spirit&#039;s leading?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Makes perfect sense (now here is the &#8220;but&#8221;) What if the congregation isn&#8217;t willing to re-engage? I see many churches close their doors in my denomination each year because they won&#8217;t, can&#8217;t, or say they don&#8217;t have the &#8220;right&#8221; pastor (leadership) to do so.  Sounds like leadership from within the church (laity) needs to embrace the Holy Spirit&#8217;s leading?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rev Bill &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Transformation Means Re-Engaging The Neighborhood</title>
		<link>http://www.evangelismcoach.org/2008/re-engaging-the-neighborhood/comment-page-1/#comment-1491</link>
		<dc:creator>Rev Bill &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Transformation Means Re-Engaging The Neighborhood</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Jul 2009 17:53:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.evangelismcoach.org/2008/09/re-engaging-the-neighborhood#comment-1491</guid>
		<description>[...] a wonderful article on ways churches can engage their neighborhoods and serve those around them. You can read the article here. While visiting his site browse around awhile &#8212; he does some great stuff and has some very [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] a wonderful article on ways churches can engage their neighborhoods and serve those around them. You can read the article here. While visiting his site browse around awhile &#8212; he does some great stuff and has some very [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Derek Iannelli-Smith</title>
		<link>http://www.evangelismcoach.org/2008/re-engaging-the-neighborhood/comment-page-1/#comment-1490</link>
		<dc:creator>Derek Iannelli-Smith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Jul 2009 10:00:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.evangelismcoach.org/2008/09/re-engaging-the-neighborhood#comment-1490</guid>
		<description>Good article.  Reminds me of some other influences recently Tim Chester/Steve Timmis and Frank Viola&#039;s work.  The total church conference recently done at Kaleo (audios are on the web) addresses this topic very well.  It is not either or... it is both... If a &#039;church&#039; is going to be missional, then I believe they need to get away from the &#039;come and see&#039; and remember the &#039;see and go&#039; or as we call it at Oasis.... drink and go...  investing in people without an agenda other than to participate in God&#039;s plan to move onto the next step takes time.  I am not talking about friendship evangelism, I am talking about intentional gospel-centered evangelism.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good article.  Reminds me of some other influences recently Tim Chester/Steve Timmis and Frank Viola&#8217;s work.  The total church conference recently done at Kaleo (audios are on the web) addresses this topic very well.  It is not either or&#8230; it is both&#8230; If a &#8216;church&#8217; is going to be missional, then I believe they need to get away from the &#8216;come and see&#8217; and remember the &#8217;see and go&#8217; or as we call it at Oasis&#8230;. drink and go&#8230;  investing in people without an agenda other than to participate in God&#8217;s plan to move onto the next step takes time.  I am not talking about friendship evangelism, I am talking about intentional gospel-centered evangelism.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Don</title>
		<link>http://www.evangelismcoach.org/2008/re-engaging-the-neighborhood/comment-page-1/#comment-1487</link>
		<dc:creator>Don</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Jul 2009 19:51:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.evangelismcoach.org/2008/09/re-engaging-the-neighborhood#comment-1487</guid>
		<description>Our Chicago suburb requires us to build bridges that people are willing to cross 75% of the new people in our church are unchurched who have been touched through one of our bridge events.
We do a combo block/back to school party. It includes live music (80%secular 20% Christian) food and events for the children.
We aren&#039;t trying to lead them to the Lord (YET) we just want to become part of their lives, which in turn opens door for sharing the gospel.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Our Chicago suburb requires us to build bridges that people are willing to cross 75% of the new people in our church are unchurched who have been touched through one of our bridge events.<br />
We do a combo block/back to school party. It includes live music (80%secular 20% Christian) food and events for the children.<br />
We aren&#8217;t trying to lead them to the Lord (YET) we just want to become part of their lives, which in turn opens door for sharing the gospel.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Todd</title>
		<link>http://www.evangelismcoach.org/2008/re-engaging-the-neighborhood/comment-page-1/#comment-1485</link>
		<dc:creator>Todd</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Jul 2009 16:24:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.evangelismcoach.org/2008/09/re-engaging-the-neighborhood#comment-1485</guid>
		<description>Excellent post.  Isreal was God&#039;s people- a light to the Gentiles whioh was supposed to draw the nations to Christ.  The new Isreal is sent into the nations to bring people to Christ.  Thanks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Excellent post.  Isreal was God&#8217;s people- a light to the Gentiles whioh was supposed to draw the nations to Christ.  The new Isreal is sent into the nations to bring people to Christ.  Thanks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Darrel Davis</title>
		<link>http://www.evangelismcoach.org/2008/re-engaging-the-neighborhood/comment-page-1/#comment-992</link>
		<dc:creator>Darrel Davis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Sep 2008 13:08:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.evangelismcoach.org/2008/09/re-engaging-the-neighborhood#comment-992</guid>
		<description>Chris, I believe churches have to get out of the &quot;If you build it, they will come&quot; mindset. The attractional church usually only pulls in other Christians who are unhappy with their current church. It is not appealing to the lost. The church must go it if it expects the lost to come in. Good post.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Chris, I believe churches have to get out of the &#8220;If you build it, they will come&#8221; mindset. The attractional church usually only pulls in other Christians who are unhappy with their current church. It is not appealing to the lost. The church must go it if it expects the lost to come in. Good post.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
